Friday, 9 January 2009

The Mirror Pool

As I tie up the first act (that's one third of the novel first-passed), and as we bounce upon the lacy bladder of a new year, I'd like to do a little reflection.
I still feel very much like a noob, and I still find myself learning what I feel are obscenely obvious things on a regular basis. But I'm learning more and more, too, that this feeling never goes away, and should not be prohibitive! So here are the most important lessons I've learned - and I mean properly learned such that I understand and apply them - during the course of the last 30,000 words or so:

1) Swelling the river. By tying everything into the protag's quest, I transformed my novel. The fat has been trimmed and everything leads somewhere. And with the fat trimmed, everything leads somewhere quicker! However, I could only realise this by looking at a bigger picture (woods and trees and all that).

2) Just write. I read so many comments on agents' blogs from writers who all, ultimately, express the same thought: I can do it. We know that's not true; it's very far removed from being true. Regardless, there's a world of difference between 'can' and 'do'.
I blog to keep a journal of my discoveries and it's useful to me to spit this stuff out of my head. But, in the years I've been writing, this is only the second time I've finished a first act. I've noodled here and there, and it's all been fun and all of it has been valuable. But none of that stuff has made a career.
I've upped my game and have found new mysterious pockets of time within which to write. And I'm no longer stopping to refine a chapter: it's straight on with the next. It's easy to see how, as the novel evolves, I'll need to go back and amend a few paragraphs here and there. But they can wait. I have another 60,000 words to write first. A daunting prospect, for sure, and it comes with no guarantees of success or even satisfaction, but in terms of carving out a career, it has to be preferable to the noodling.

3) The trouble with orgasms. Learning to temper exposition and fancy prose, and to get to the bloody point (indeed, to understand the point!), has made a world of difference to my writing. In revamping the structure to TC, I wrote out every scene on a card (I had no paper plates to hand) and circled those which were powerful and eventful. It was actually surprising to me to observe such a paltry gathering of circles. Goodbye to all those unnecessary protag musings; hello to conflict and strong emotional charges. (N.B. I observed that these circles occurred predominantly at the point where a subplot connects to the protag's quest [see Swelling the river].)

4) Understanding my abstract. What am I attempting to achieve? What do I enjoy about writing? Where do I want to take it? What are my strengths and weaknesses?
It's worth plotting a little roadmap.
It might be hard finding any comfort in all of this, but I can say that I feel better about what I am doing now than ever before, and that has to be of some value. And it helps to know that we're all in this together! Fools!

Tuesday, 6 January 2009

Heart



Lashings of warm Happy New Year spirits to all my wonderful maggoty companions!
Let's begin '09 with a little catch up:

Word up to the Extra Sensory gypsy king and Mystery Genius Harris for offering me love. Although I fear I might be too late to have escaped the curse!


1. Where is your cell phone? Kitchen.

2. Where is your significant other? Head.

3. Your hair color? Natural.

4. Your mother? Quiet.

5. Your father? Loud.

6. Your favourite thing? Writing.

7. Your dream last night? Trees.

8. Your dream/goal? Peace.

9. The room you’re in? Cobwebby.

10. Your hobby? Guess.

11. Your fear? Failure.

12. Where do you want to be in 6 years? Closer.

13. Where were you last night? Bed.

14. What you’re not? Clever.

15. One of your wish-list items? Hug.

16. Where you grew up? Everywhere.

17. The last thing you did? Everywhere.

18. What are you wearing? Slippers.

19. Your TV? Off.

20. Your pet? Pokémon.

21. Your computer? Hummmm.

22. Your mood? Exhausted.

23. Missing someone? Naturally.

24. Your car? Nope.

25. Something you’re not wearing? Lemsip.

26. Favourite store? Amazon.

27. Your summer? Memorable.

28. Love someone? Son.

29. Your favorite color? Teal.

30. When is the last time you laughed? Hahaha.

31. Last time you cried? Pass.

91b. If you could make up an extra question which would require you to apologise for being so foolish, what would it be? Sorry.

My three most hearted blog bastions are: ricardo, esy, and mg.
Plus four more drawn at random from the 'next blog' button (because it would be too time-consuming to decide from other regular haunts and, who knows, that next blogger might become your best friend!):
Rhsaai Teodora Awards, Papel y Seda, Educatión Física, and De la Piedra a la Luna.

Tuesday, 18 November 2008

Resonance


Had a quick shimmy through various dictionary definitions.
Resonance is about echoes and endurance and evocation.

So, it transpires that Sylar is Nathan and Peter's brother eh? (Heroes.)
And Darth Vader is Luke and Leia's dad.
So what's the big deal? Why are so many plots peppered with familial revelations?
And just what does a reader want from an author anyway?

I'm guessing that the reader responds to things he recognises.
Or, to put it another way, that he'll not be bothered about your hero's quest if he finds nothing recognisable within it.

I asked a friend what he thought about the Heroes reveal. He wasn't bothered. I asked him what he was bothered about. He gave examples of movies that culminated in achievement and accolades - those movies in which the protag ultimately achieves his goal, typically an academic one, and receives the recognition that he has been fighting for (from his peers). My friend is an academic, about to head off to Maria country (Oxford) to create virtual bones. His family, I understand, were very hard on him as he grew up. He was designed for academia. His father has achieved great things. Hence, his views on family are tainted with none of the excitement and desire which he assigns to individual achievement.
So, it's not simply enough to provide recognisable situations; these situations need to be tailored to an intended audience.
However, family, despite being fallible as a resonant device, is usually a safe bet because it has a huge catchment area.

I was lured to a free coffee stall in the market square a few weeks ago by a girl who explained 'The boss has a new woman'. Apparently, that was the explanation for the coffee giveaway.
As a salesman, I discovered that people need an explanation. Why is this restaurant inviting me down for free grub? Why does this golf course need my custom? Why are your computers so cheap? So we would always give them a reason. It's their third birthday, or they've just redecorated, or whatever. It doesn't matter. Just a reason. People need resonance; we need to find a personal relevance, otherwise we are suspicious or indifferent. Surely, more people would be willing to empathise with the boss who has found the love of his life than would empathise with the boss who wants to entice you away from your favourite coffee shop?

Tuesday, 11 November 2008

Wait for me



Having brazenly concluded that the reader should be primed immediately before a major reveal, I must now justify my claim.
Here's what I reckon.

It's likely that any fresh revelation is gonna require of the reader a bit of thought: suddenly, the reader must apply this new knowledge to all that has gone before.
Ah, so Vader is Luke's dad! Let me think about how that works ...
In this example, Luke and Vader bash out this revelation together. Once the loose ends are tied up, Luke makes his decision and falls to almost certain doom.
The movie waits for the viewer to catch up.
However, a more mature audience probably won't want, or need, an explanation of the effects of a revelation.

The reveal is a critical moment. You get one stab at it. If the reader is primed and the reveal is freshly set-up in his head, then it will instantly hit home. Emotional response. Yay.

For an example of what not to do, let's take a look at Saw IV.
What an awful ending. Hit with one reveal, my mind started dealing with the implications, but was given no time to do so before it had to deal with a load more nonsensical and supposedly climactic moments (I knew they were supposed to be big deals because that music was kicking off). The film gave my brain too much to process at once and I found myself several steps behind the revelations.
You get one stab at them. So be quite sure that the reader is precisely where you want him, and then allow him time to adjust.
By the time the Saw IV credits began to roll, I had no idea what had just happened and, with no more movie to watch, cast the thoughts from my head and got on with something else.

All of these thoughts are leading to my big question:
How should I conclude my first act?

I figure that, with a hypothetical down-time between acts I and II, I am entitled (and perhaps even expected) to present the reader with some sort of revelation that will require some thought. There aren't many places where I can easily do this in a novel. For one, a major revelation would then require the pace to slow (so that the reader can catch up). For two, a major revelation would be hard to eclipse later on. Little reveals, for sure, but stuff that creates so much change, be it a major reveal or a reversal or whatever, needs some consideration from the reader.

I'm cool with this theory, but ...
I'm giving serious thought to shifting the negative opening to act II - also an event which requires of the reader a reasonable amount of contemplation - to the end of act I, such that it follows the positive ending I have already.
In principle, this would give me a lovely, rapid-fire positive to negative switch, and two key moments back-to-back. And, I've figured out how to use an incongruity between these two events to create a humorous and ironic conclusion. Importantly, the reader is invited to reconsider the course of the hero's journey and to reasses how it might continue. And anticipation is always the key (anticipation = page turning).
Provided that the first trigger doesn't require too much immediate contemplation, my plan might just work.

In considering how best to conclude an act, I guess it's worth considering the nature of this virtual void, this limbo, which reaches from the end of one act to the beginning of the next. In this limbo, we can dare to gift the reader with things that we wouldn't dare elsewhere.

I have thoughts to come on degrees of space (limbos). In his essay on the elements of style, Robert Louis Stevenson refers to a web of phrases bound by rhythm and meaning. Consider the breathing spaces that reside within commas, semi-colons, full-stops, line breaks, and all the way through to the inexorable void that sits at the novel's end ...